dispute

photo source

One of the hot topics in museum studies is, and has been for decades, that of looted items in museums. Oddly enough, despite my years of study in that arena, I have not formed an opinion on the matter. It's a subject which dwells frequently in the back of my mind, and this recent article and Op-Ed from the New York Times brought it to the forefront.

The most famously contested collection in a museum are the Elgin Marbles in the British Museum, removed by Thomas Bruce, Lord Elgin, from the Acropolis during the early part of the 19th Century. The trouble is, of course, that although Elgin may or may not have obtained permission from the Ottoman Empire, said permission does not have the support of the Greek government. In fact, the Greeks very much want them back.

I see both sides of the issue. The marbles are unquestionably Greek, and certainly represent a great chunk of Greek history. However, had Elgin not absconded with them when he did, they might very well not exist. The Turks stored gunpowder in the Parthenon, which had already gone kaboom once before. So, 200 years ago, the marbles became a piece of British history, controversial though they are.

I have a bit more of a bias when it comes to Italian antiquities, likely by virture of having lived there Not that I don't believe they represent a part of Italy's history--on the contrary. The trouble is that Italy just has so much history. The amount of art there is staggering, but the funds necessary to maintain are limited (it's a country, after all, not a museum). Additionally, a great amount of the art is exposed to the elements, which is frustrating especially in the cases of Pompeii and Ostia Antica, when nature did such a wonderful (if tragic, in Pompeii's case) job of preserving frescoes and mosaics (like the fantastic Cave Canem, or "Beware of the Dog" fresco, above).

So. That's my rant. Of a sort. I do recommend reading the Op-Ed, which is about museum treatment of artifacts of contested provenence, and is quite good. If anyone is interested in additional information on this topic (say, for example, the Italian restorations of Leonardo's Last Supper and Michelangelo's Sistene Chapel Ceiling, or who really made the Venus de Milo), let me know! I've got a ton of this stuff rattling around in my head.

La Puerta Originals

You could say that I like doors. You could also say that the Pope thinks that God's a pretty cool guy. That's a pretty equivalent understatement. So, as someone who loves unique and interesting doors the way that some people love to breathe, I feel safe in declaring: I've hit the motherlode.Introducing La Puerta Originals, a Santa Fe-based operation that takes a love of doors, conservation, and architecture and rolls it all up into one gorgeous package.

"What is now La Puerta Originals, started as one man's vision. Two decades ago, Scott Coleman, an architect and custom builder and traveler, adopted a hobby of combing the world for antique doors and old wood. The materials he initially salvaged were being discarded or destroyed in their countries of origin. The beauty of the pieces inspired him to recreate them into functional art. He began to fashion these old doors into new interior doors, impressive entry doors, wood gates, ornamental shutters and more."

They don't just do exterior doors, either. In fact, they can and will do just about anything: furniture, architectural elements, floors, ceilings, plus gates and interior doors.
Personally, my favourites are the smaller doors, particularly the following:

I can honestly say that there isn't one thing I dislike about La Puerta Originals. Okay, I lied, they could be a teensy bit closer to Virginia.

These photos taken from both the portfolio and installation sections of the site.